Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gene Nelson, Ph.D.'s avatar

Here's a big, "Thank you" to the network of GreenNUKE subscribers and commenters that started slightly more than ten months ago. We now have 557 subscribers! There are 22 GreenNUKE articles and short commentaries. We've also cross-posted several articles from other Substacks.

Please continue to help GreenNUKE to grow by sharing our content with your friends and colleagues and encouraging them to subscribe. We are aware that Diablo Canyon **opponents** will be boosting their California public outreach in 2025. One of the ways to neutralize those typically fear-based narratives is to explain the physics, engineering, and economics in ways the general public can understand. This public outreach is central to GreenNUKE's mission.

Expand full comment
Grumpy's avatar

Amazingly good article. In simple terms I explain it like this.

Most people know that AC power is a sine wave.

That's the ideal, as Nicolai Tesla created it a century ago.

In reality motors and appliances load the grid awkwardly compared to the ideal incandescent light bulb. A distorted sine wave has a "poor power factor" and the grid equipment is far less efficient. Transformers and wires get hotter while doing less useful work.

Hot equipment can reach a breaking point and cause blackouts.

Now it is actually true that solar and batteries COULD lend inertia to the grid.

Software can predict where the "heavy Iron" should be. Apparent.com has tech for this.

The problem is "The Agents of Chaos" don't want a stable grid. The Enron's of the world speculate on the momentary price of electricity. They LOVE Solar because because Every Afternoon at 4:20 the Solar Systems quit working, maybe they are smoking weed, I dunno. That manufactured emergency is an opportunity only Gas Frackers can save us from, demanding Heroic prices, for the little bit of gas it takes to avoid local blackouts.

So the Solar stability option is suppressed, even in California, because the utilities don't want it-- they make huge amounts of money at the CAISO Casino, betting on every cloud bank approaching a solar farm as if it were a race track. Imagine how the traders must hate nuclear! How do you win a bet on an energy supply that operates 95% of the time and only buys fuel once a year, and probably has a 10 year fuel contract? Nothing for Enron's "Smartest Guys In The Room" to do to satisfy the gambling addiction.

It would be funny but out of control speculation probably makes California household and industrial bills MUCH higher than they would be in Washington or Utah.

So it's hard to make the grid stable when the money is made on it being unstable. Which is of course why America created utility regulators in the first place, but after nearly a century folks are ready to get fooled again.

There is nothing wrong with California's grid from Wall Street's perspective. It's causing wildfires and poverty and destroying all manufacturing, even data centers in California. But Utility shareholders are happy. Its sad when Wall Street's short term profiteering is the dominant factor in energy policy. Herds of MBA's playing zero-sum gains boosting their favorite stocks aren't serving the people well at all.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts