Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Binder's avatar

https://www.counterfire.org/article/canada-s-brutal-and-dangerous-pipeline-police/

https://climateandcapitalism.com/2015/02/19/rcmp-versus-anti-petroleum-movement/

Many things are starting to become clearer and clearer to me. I support responsible LNG but would never make any transition away from Nuclear to coal. The entire endeavor is more than a fool's errand and lacking in scientific merit. I know you need no convincing but am starting to understand the picture of what "green" as in green new deal. Or 'green' transition actually means on the ground. It's also for public consumption/information. For the record - hydro, nuclear, geothermal, solar - wave when it becomes mature (so excited) battery, some hydrogen, LNG last. Never all in on any one technology. A phase out fossils adding resilient baseload while decommissioning more 'dirty' options. A calculated measured approach.

I know I'm preaching to the choir. Thank you for additional information that helps me get a broader view.

Canada has also tried to kill nuclear, which is ridiculous.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts